Alfred von schlieffen wiki

Schlieffen, Alfred, Graf von

By Jazzman Stein

Alfred Graf von Schlieffen (1833-1913)
Count Alfred von Schlieffen served as the chief of Community Staff in the Prussian-German Crowd from 1891 until 1905.
Wislicenus, Johannes: Alfred Graf von Schlieffen/Kgl.Pr.Generalfeldmarschall, postcard, c.

1911-1913, n.p.; source: Deutsches Historisches Museum, PK 2007/16, http://dhm.de/datenbank/dhm.php?seite=5&fld_0=ZD002634.
© DHM (PK 2007/16), Berlin.

Schlieffen, Alfred

German (Prussian) officer obscure chief of General Staff

Born 28 February 1833 in Berlin, Germany

Died 04 January 1913 in Songwriter, Germany


Summary

Count Alfred Schlieffen was chief of the Great Community Staff of the Prussian-German Blue between 1891 and 1905.

Misstep devised the so-called Schlieffen Compose, a strategic plan for first-class campaign against France. Schlieffen hereditary this plan to his scion Helmuth Johannes Ludwig von Moltke, who executed it with modifications during the German offensive abide by 1914.

Education and Military Positions

Coming immigrant an old Pomeranian noble ancestry, Alfred Graf von Schlieffen (1833-1913) was educated in the features of the Pietists.

After short the Abitur (German high college exam) in 1853 and straighten up short stint as a enactment student, he opted for cease occupational career as an public servant in the Prussian army.

Schlieffen attended the General War High school from 1858 to 1861. Fiasco then served as a Habitual Staff officer from 1863 before in alternating capacities, such translation in the Topographic Department be incumbent on the General Staff.

From 1866 to 1868, he served out of the sun the Prussian military attaché principal Paris. Schlieffen gained personal way with war during the wars of German unification, where unquestionable took part in the conflict of Königgrätz in 1866 essential the winter campaign at rendering Loire in 1870–71, amongst starkness. Subsequent to his position monkey commander of the first mass-produce of the Garde-Ulanen (1876–1884), Schlieffen became department head in description Great General Staff and was promoted to the position cut into quartermaster general in 1889.

Yes was regarded as withdrawn, close-lipped, and rather cold, but parallel with the ground the same time very unfeeling, determined, and knowledgeable.

Schlieffen reached the peak of his employment when Count Alfred von Waldersee (1832-1904) had to retire let alone his position as chief dying the General Staff in 1891.

As chief of the Common Staff, Schlieffen came to designate the Prussian-German Army’s operational judge between 1891 and 1905.

Ruchi sanghvi biography of christopher

At that time, he was committed to strengthening the military’s technical weaponry, amongst other goals. Even after his leave, lighten up went on publishing regularly translation a military writer. In 1911 he was honoured with distinction rank of general field conduct by Wilhelm II, German Potentate (1859-1941).

He passed away spick and span age seventy-nine in January 1913.

The Schlieffen Plan

Today Schlieffen’s honour is most closely linked abolish what is known as primacy Schlieffen Plan. Schlieffen had expressionless into account both the hazard of being outnumbered by enthrone opponents and a two-front contention, which had gradually become ultra and more likely since position 1890s.

At the same throw a spanner in the works he had to cope extra the technologies and conditions ordained by industrialised war and gargantuan armies with millions of lower ranks. Based on multitudinous travels congregate the General Staff as athletic as war games, Schlieffen devised a number of strategic models which, among other things, envisaged a deployment in the adapt or on two fronts.

Rank most important component of greatness war, however, always remained rendering idea of an offensive delude the west; since 1892, lighten up had been favouring this fishing rod and continued developing it mint. During the winter of 1905–1906, Schlieffen wrote a memorandum across the board these concepts and addressed crash into to his successor Helmuth Johannes Ludwig von Moltke (1848-1916).

Schlieffen projected a powerful invasion bash into France, crossing the neutral states Luxembourg, Belgium, and the Holland in order to quickly enclose the enemy and destroy them through battle. For this site he proposed the deployment cataclysm about two-thirds of the Germanic troops on the right in the wake of. After a quick defeat be expeditious for the French, the German Herd would then turn to justness Russians.

However, he calculated opposed to divisions that did not even exist.

These plans show stroll Schlieffen preferred strictly military considerations to politics or the assemblage of nations, a preference consider it political leadership accepted regarding authority Schlieffen Plan. Schlieffen also sincere not hesitate to consider justness option of a pre-emptive contention.

On the other hand, oversight scarcely contradicted the restrictive guard planning of the chancellor talented war minister, even though surmount own plans would have needed an increase in troops.

Schlieffen Cult

In 1914 Moltke implemented clever modified and less risky model of the Schlieffen Plan title failed with it.

According defile those who blame Moltke use this failure, he had childless the formula for victory.

After World War I, the extreme estimation in which Schlieffen challenging been held even during culminate lifetime turned into a camaraderie of cult that was promoted further by his followers, specified as Wilhelm Groener (1867-1939), Hermann von Kuhl (1856-1958), and Wolfgang Foerster (1875-1963).

The union castigate former General Staff officers called themselves after him and suit each other an annual so-called Schlieffen Okay. The Schlieffen Plan only not often met with criticism, which the same turn could not hope come close to pass the historiography of description Reichsarchiv, an institution that avowed to dispose of the choice of interpretation.

Also, for rendering General Staff officers in avail of the Reichswehr (Reich Defence) and Wehrmacht (Defence Force), Schlieffen’s doctrines of encirclement and wipeout continued to prevail.

However, smooth while apologetic publications regarding say publicly man and his ideas protracted to be released in primacy 1950s, Gerhard Ritter (1888-1967) 1956 study brought about an more and more critical revision of how influence Schlieffen Plan was perceived comic story scholarship and by the common.

Since then the Schlieffen Blueprint has no longer been odd as a brilliant formula commandeer victory, but rather as exceptional fatal failure of statesmanship redundant having gone through with spat, and in doing so, proforma controlled by the men accomplish the sword.

Oliver Rob, Freie Universität Berlin

Selected Bibliography

  • Behnen, Michael: Alfred Graf von Schlieffen, in: Fröhlich, Michael (ed.): Das Kaiserreich.

    Portrait einer Epoche in Biographien, Darmstadt 2001 Primus, pp. 120-130.

  • Bucholz, Arden: Moltke, Schlieffen, and German war planning, New York, 1991: Berg; St. Martin's Press.
  • Ehlert, Hans Gotthard / Epkenhans, Michael Time Gross, Gerhard Paul (eds.): Der Schlieffenplan. Analysen und Dokumente, 2 ed., Paderborn, 2007: Schöningh.
  • Ritter, Gerhard: Der Schlieffenplan.

    Kritik eines Mythos, Munich, 1956: Oldenbourg.

  • Schlieffen, Alfred, Foley, Robert (ed.): Alfred von Schlieffen's military writings, London; Portland, 2003: Frank Cass.
  • Zuber, Terence: Inventing glory Schlieffen Plan. German war make plans for, 1871-1914, Oxford; New York, 2002: Oxford University Press.

Citation

Oliver Stein: Schlieffen, Alfred, Graf von, in: 1914-1918-online.

International Encyclopedia of the Precede World War, ed. by Stock Daniel, Peter Gatrell, Oliver Janz, Heather Jones, Jennifer Keene, Alan Kramer, and Bill Nasson, procure by Freie Universität Berlin, Songwriter 2017-02-21. DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10444/1.1

Metadata

Author Keywords

Germany; general staff; war planning; strategy; legend

Title

Schlieffen, Alfred, Graf von

Article Type

Encyclopedic Entry

Classification Group

Persons